Saturday, May 05, 2007

A Virtuoso ignored, or - it's all about context, stupid!

I was really intrigued by what I am writing about today when I read about it in Julie's blog a few weeks ago, and then I forgot about it. Then, I was reminded of it by a shorter version of the Washington Post article about this "experiment" that appeared in the May 4 issue of The Week.

Here is what this "experiment" - which had been set up by the Washington Post's Gene Weingarten - was all about: On January 12, 2007, the 39 year old, amazingly handsome virtuoso violonist Joshua Bell who, according to Julie, "gets something like $1,000 per minute for solo performances in the world's fanciest halls" performed, for a period of 43 minutes, six classical pieces on his $3.5 million Stradivarius. The one particularity of this performance is that it took place during the morning rush hour (from 7:51 to 8:34) in the L'Enfant Plaza metro station in Washington, D.C.

This experiment was, according to the Washington Post one "in context, perception, and priorities - as well an an unblinking assessment of public taste: In a banal setting at an inconvenient time, would beauty transcend?"

During those 43 minutes, 1,097 people passed by. "Seven people stopped what they were doing to hang around and take in the performance, at least for a minute. Twenty-seven gave money, most of them on the run -- for a total of $32 and change [note: that is not counting $20.00 given by Stacy Furukawa, a demographer at the Commerce Department, the only person who recognized Bell.] That leaves the 1,070 people who hurried by, oblivious, many only three feet away, few even turning to look."

And, by the way, Bell did not play easy little ditties. One of the pieces he performed, "Chaconne," from Johann Sebastian Bach's Partita No. 2 in D minor, is "considered one of the most difficult violin pieces to master" and "it's exhaustingly long - 14 minutes."

Here is a shortish excerpt of Joshua Bell's performance in the D.C. subway - parts of it have been speeded up, ironically, in Koyaanisqatsi-style, making all commuters look like robots:



So, what happened here? Most of the passersby must have been educated folks - probably midlevel federal employees who are not foreign to classical music and high quality live performances in the most reputable Washington, D.C. venues. But, let's face it. Street performers often fail to make people stop in their tracks and listen to them. This was also rush hour which, as its name indicates, is a time when people are focused on making it to work on time, not on taking in a virtuoso violin performance.

Does this mean, as British author John Lane argues in his 2003 book Timeless Beauty, that there has been a "loss of the appreciation of beauty in the modern world," that "beauty has become irrelevant" because "our priorities have changed"? I am not convinced of that fact.

For sure, the attention span of most folks has become so short that, incapable of focusing on anything for more than 30 seconds, they incessantly switch channels with their remote-controls. And there's a lot of bad art, bad music, bad literature around that sells incredibly well to the masses, but I don't think that this is anything new. Bad taste is timeless, and the failure to appreciate great art did not begin with this generation - although it is true, to a point, that modern life has turned us all into drones. There was this interesting quote in the Washington Post article about this experiment:

What is this life if, full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare.

- from "Leisure," by W.H. Davies -

But, basically, what this experiment proved is that, in a banal setting at an inconvenient time, beauty seldom, if ever, transcends, because context is everything.

And, interestingly enough, in a "live discussion with Washington Post writers," Gene Weingarten (April 9, 2007) mentions that, "nearly 20 years ago, Bruce Springsteen did a similar thing in Copenhagen, where he joined a street musician to perform 'The River'," and that "not many people noticed him, either." Frankly, I beg to differ. There is obviously a huge crowd gathered around Springsteen and the street performer and, at the very end of the performance, someone yells out a request for "Born to Run.") Check it out below (and I find it very cool that Bruce would play a song with a street performer, but I believe that it's just the kind of guy he is):



And this reminded me very vaguely of an experiment run years ago, when I was a teenager, on French TV. This was to find out if the words from the famous 1958 Serge Gainsbourg song Le poinçonneur des Lilas stating that the transit authority guy who punches your ticket is "Le gars qu'on croise et qu'on n' regarde pas" ("the guy you walk by and do not look at") were true. The producers of the variety show that had sponsored that experiment had Roger Couderc, a beloved French TV announcer and celebrity, perform the duties of ticket-puncher at the Paris Métro station Porte des Lilas, just to see if anyone would recognize him. Well, hardly anyone did. Again, because: 1. People probably do not pay attention to ticket-punchers, and 2. No one would have expected Roger Couderc to be the ticket-puncher.

And I would like to ask you, as Julie had done it on her blog - what about you? - Do you think that would have recognized an unusually masterful performance by this out-of-the-ordinary street musician? Would you have stopped to listen for a while, and would you have given him some money?

Labels:

7 Comments:

At 9:23 PM, Blogger Passante said...

Here's what I think. The majority of federal employees probably aren't as cultured as you suggest, and if they even listen to classical music, they probably recognize only the popular stuff that our pathetic excuse for a classical radio station (and don't even get me started on that!) airs. The other thing is that many government offices treat their employees like kindergartners who have to arrive at their appointed second, take 30 minutes (not 29 or 31) for lunch, and leave on time. If someone is clocking you in, it makes it hard to stop and listen.

 
At 10:38 AM, Blogger Elisabeth said...

In other words, have they become such drones that they can no longer take time to appreciate beauty? There was this quote somewhere in the Washington Post article on this experiment:
What is this life if, full of care,
We have no time to stand and stare.

- from "Leisure," by W.H. Davies -

 
At 8:25 AM, Blogger V-Grrrl said...

I don't think it's fair to expect Americans to stop and listen during rush hour on the way to work. Passante is right--in America you can't cruise in a few moments late to work and expect it not be noted.

What if it had been in the evening?

I heard a sermon based on this news story, which noted that the only people to stop and really listen were children.

Because I use public transit all the time, I tend to associate street musicians with beggars, and I have to admit that once I saw the open violin case in front of him, I'd probably stop "hearing" the music and scurry past. If the violin case was closed and he was not collecting money, maybe then I would stop and consider the music.

 
At 9:24 AM, Blogger Paperback Writer said...

A few years ago John Melloncamp (I think he still had the Cougar in his name) was backpacking the the East Coast. Pittsburgh was a stop so when he got here, he sat down in Market Square and just started playing.

I remember thinking how lucky those people were being treated to a free concert. But now, I'm not sure if anyone would have recognized him. Someone eventually did because more a crowd gathered.

Anyway, if someone is playing an instrument I usually try to stop and hear them. There's a pretty decent violinist on the streets of Sq. Hill and I try to stop and give her money.

And on the flip side there's a not so decent violinist on the streets of Oakland. I like him though so I stop and listen.

 
At 11:19 PM, Blogger srp said...

There are some classical pieces that are so haunting it grabs your attention and won't let go. How that music works in a noisy metro station, I don't know. Some of it requires total concentration for full effect. I think this experiment may superficially indicate a lack of taste for great music, but the setting was artificial. Many of the same people that walked by in the crowd might be moved to tears if the same piece were played in a concert hall. Even if they didn't know who the artist was or the price of his violin, many would feel the depth and power of the music if the setting were even in their own living room.

 
At 5:51 PM, Blogger BellCollecting.com said...

I am inclined to agree with the 'Saw Lady' ( www.SawLady.com/blog ) - she is a NYC subway musician as well as a stage musician, and she talks about the differences between the art form of busking and that of stage performing. In order to get people to stop and listen on the street you need to know not only how to play music well, but also how to busk.
I have a lot of respect for buskers - just think of how much guts it must take to perform on the street!

Michelle

 
At 11:23 PM, Blogger Nathan Mattox said...

I used to live in LA, and there I remember walking down Hollywood Blvd. a couple of different times and stopping to watch the breakdancers, and a big crowd would stop and watch in amazement. Perhaps LA is a little different, since it is a "performance" type of town, or perhaps the location was more suited to tourists who didn't have much else to do, but also, are mid-level Washington beurocrats a good pairing for high-brow entertainment like classical violin. Perhaps part of this "context" is knowing your audience. I just don't see that audience being very familiar with Bell or classical violin, though it is no doubt universally beautiful. good post

 

Post a Comment

<< Home